Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5636 14
Original file (NR5636 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

EGA
Docket No: 5636-14
21 May 2015

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TO% Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF es Sane aeRO USN,

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

 

 

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments

(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting that his RE-4 reentry code, issued on

14 March 2014, be changed.

ae’ reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
u

stice on 19 May 2015, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

 

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

c. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy and began a period of
active duty on 31 March 2008. Although his medical records were
not available for review, enough evidence existed to show that
he was diagnosed with a medical condition interfering
EGA
Docket No: 5636-14

with the performance of his duties and that he was recommended
for administrative separation due to a condition not a
disability. Subsequently, he was issued an RE-4 reenlistment
code upon separation on 14 March 2014.

d. Petitioner submitted a copy of his last performance
evaluation with an individual trait average of 3.86.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of his performance evaluation, the Board
concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants favorable action.

The Board noted that Petitioner was honorably discharged due to
a condition that was not a disability, and assigned an RE-4
reentry code. However, based upon further review and his most
recent performance evaluation, which notes an individual trait
average of 3.86, the Board concluded that his RE-4 reentry code
should now be changed to a more appropriate code to coincide
with his reason for separation. In this regard, the Board
concluded that the “RE-4” reentry code was invalid and as such,
his record should be changed to reflect an “RE-3G”" reentry code.

 

 

RECOMMENDATION :

 

a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that
on 14 March 2014, he received an “RE-3G” reentry code.

 

b. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

c. That, upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs
be informed that Petitioner's application was received by the
Board on 4 April 2014.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c) it is certified that a quorum was
EGA
Docket No: 5636-14

present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

 

T. J. REED
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

   

ROBERT J. O’NEILL
Executive director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR988 14

    Original file (NR988 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    EGA Docket No: 0988-14 23 March 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ry osu, XXX-XX- Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. O'Neill, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 February 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04647-07

    Original file (04647-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 4647-07 19 July 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: FORM! Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by changing his reentry code issued on 22 October 2001. With respect to his reentry code the Board notes that the RE-4 reentry code is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4634 14

    Original file (NR4634 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 EGA Docket No: 4634-14 29 May 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF i Se, USN, Ref ; (a) 10 U.S.C. In this regard, on 17 February 2004, he was issued a Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) which reflected an honorable characterization of service by reason of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4664 14

    Original file (NR4664 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his “general discharge under honorable conditions” be changed to “honorable,” per reference (b). The Board, consisting RR es eee ee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 April 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0533 14

    Original file (NR0533 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the narrative reason for separation (Fraudulent entry into military service (other)) and the RE-4 reentry code issued on 17 February 2009, be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bey, Ms. Lapinski, and Mr. Storz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice © on 12 March 2014, and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2947 13

    Original file (NR2947 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. In the alternative, that his general characterization of service be upgraded to honorable, RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed to RE-1, and receive full involuntary separation pay. Although Petitioner was medically diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, the DD Form 214 erroneously states that he was discharged by reason of a “PERSONALITY DISORDER”.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11884 14

    Original file (NR11884 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and particularly in light of the Army orthopedic surgeon’s diagnosis, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting a change of Petitioner's reentry code. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 8 January 2014, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 now of record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3174 14

    Original file (NR3174 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    oOn 7 December 2007, he was counselled regarding being in a Class III (non- deployable) dental status and warned that unless he corrected his dental issues, he was subject to administrative separation. RECOMMENDATION: a: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 27 August 2008, he was issued an RE-3G reentry code vice the RE-4 now of record. a Recorder 5.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2256 14

    Original file (NR2256 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 : JDR _ Docket No: 2256-14 26 March 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD of (Ty Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of (ay and gay a. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 March 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2256 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR2256 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting change of his RE-4 reentry code. The Board, consisting (i i aa reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 16 March 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In this regard, based upon review of his corrected record, relief...